Lesson 1: Civilization of Love

The term “civilization of love” first caught my attention when I read the conclusion of Pope Leo’s encyclical Magnifica Humanitas. Although I knew I had seen it previously, this was the first time I realized it was more than a passing thought. I was even more surprised to learn that every pope since Vatican II has used it.

I was intrigued, wondering if they were laying the foundation for a major historical change. Describing our goal as the Kingdom of God has become awkward because of its connotations of monarchy, top-down control, and a next-life location. “Civilization of love” certainly facilitates answering the Council’s call for dialogue with modern society

You sense Pope Paul had that in mind when he introduced the term in a Pentecost address. Pope John Paul II picked it up to counter the culture of death he found rising in modern society. And later, popes found it helpful in critiquing violence, materialism, elitism, and other forms of dehumanization.

The dominant feature is the dignity of every human person. By granting this, the popes acknowledge that Christians can work with nonbelievers of good will in the pursuit of the common good. A “citizenship of love” is built on small everyday acts of kindness anyone can perform.

As they have employed the term, the popes have increasingly acknowledged that truth can take different forms in different places and times. They disclaim the need for the church to provide a one-and-only uniform doctrine. 

It doesn’t take long to realize that “civilization of love” is playing a central theological role in the major historical shift taking place in the Roman Catholic Church. Many cheer its reinforcement of traditional social positions, such as championing the vulnerable in society. They also think the concept expresses well our mission in the present world and our opposition to the culture of power we find rising around us.

However, rigid conservatives have been pushing back hard against the loss of absolutism in ecclesiastical office and theological doctrine. Many outright condemn it as heresy.

I plan to examine how each pope has used the term in the coming weeks. I hope in some small way to help spread it among Protestants.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. So forgiveness pre-requires understanding the mistakes of the past? here hear re this opposing this me-first, America-first, white-first, male-first approach>…

Lesson 18: God, Truth, and Reality

Sister Joan ended her book with a reprise of the monastic vision found in the Benedictine Rule. She emphasized it offers a practical way to live the Gospel now by discerning God’s presence in all creation. I understand that as perceiving the design running through all creation is the love we know in Jesus Christ. […]

Read More

Lesson 2: Vatican II’s Gaudium et Spes

It’s pretty clear that the concept of the “civilization of love” grew out of the Popes’ desire to answer the call of Gaudium et Spes. That document was groundbreaking in the historic shift that took place at Vatican II. It challenged the church to engage in dialogue with modern society rather than impose doctrine on it.  Although […]

Read More

Lesson 4:  Pope John Paul II and the Civilization of Love

I decided to trace the development of the “civilization of love” concept after reading Pope Leo’s encyclical. I was intrigued by its potential and surprised I was not aware of its long history. As expected, the development is not always smooth. For instance, I’m not sure how to read the part played by Pope John […]

Read More

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close