So forgiveness pre-requires understanding the mistakes of the past? here hear re this opposing this me-first, America-first, white-first, male-first approach>…
Lesson 4: Truth in the Gospel according to St. John
•
•
comments

Comments
3 responses to “Lesson 4: Truth in the Gospel according to St. John”
-
What an inspiring lesson. I disagree with nothing said. The confrontation and irony over truth that plays out between Jesus and Pilate is fascinating. It reminds me so much of what we see today. What passes for truth in our news outlets is a simple and condescending pander. Much is not news, it is not truth, it is simply entertainment at best and agenda driven propaganda at worst. There are truthful and compelling stories, but you must look for them. Christ’s truth is in all of us – we know it and we can feel it. We know when we do something wrong. Even Pilate knew it and could feel it. The man who would condemn Christ and wash his hands of it tried desperately to find a way out. And, yes, I agree – our leaders as Pilate is probably right. They also know what is right and do not do it, then look for excuses, find someone else to blame, and walk away with their earthly treasures as they point to man’s law as justification. Shame on them, and shame on us for allowing it to continue.
-
I’m still mulling over the last lesson, in particular, the concern to try to understand the “average” Trump voter. I had some (ok, VERY little, to tell the truth) remorse over my earlier assessment. Though I still find myself just utterly dumbfounded regarding what I’ve seen and heard articulated so far by the So-Called President’s supporters regarding their vote.
So, I thought I’d take another stab at it this time around, substituting Pilate for the aforementioned voting cadre. Seems as though Pilate is entitled to some attempt to understand where he’s coming from.
(Though the greater irony in all this is that this account of the encounter in John’s Gospel is, of course, considered, at best, a “truthful fiction” since there are no transcripts or other historically verifiable documentation.)
Pilate’s the dutiful political operative, which means he’s always between the rock and the hard place.
On the one hand, he’s the Empire’s man in Palestine and, as such, answers to Roman authority. (Good luck discerning THE TRUTH in that hot mess, especially on the cusp of the Common Era.) But on the other hand, he’s got to stay on top of a majority-Jewish population with its own authority structure, with which he has some kind of working relation. But the internal struggles among the Jews, i.e. pressure from the zealot/radical fringe, render that relationship problematic, to say the least.
On any given day, he’s got to squash the odd riot here on there, bag the troublemaking zealot and also keep a lid on the average crime rate, but he can’t overplay his hand: Rome would not be happy to get a report that the Roman garrison in Jerusalem is holded up under siege by the Jewish rabble.
Now here’s yet another nutcase, presented with accusations of claiming to be the return(AGAIN?) of the Davidic monarch. But the Jewish power brokers seem to be awfully insistent that this one should be terminated with extreme prejudice. Assurances have been given that the rabble will not bat an eye.
So what’s a Pilate to do? Is he being played by that lard-ass Caiaphas: he hangs this Jesus and all hell breaks loose during Passover? Or is it just that the Pharisees are bugged by the rumors coming in from the outlands; that this Jesus has been making them look bad all over Judea and now he’s here in Jerusalem? AND now they want Pilate to do them a favor and take out their trash?
“What is The Truth?” I can hear the world-weariness in his voice. The cynicism. Even as he’s trying to parse out the angles in this set-up, this smart-ass Jew is “playing” him. Answering a question with another question! Well, thinks Pilate, I can play that game, too. Oh, what the hell: damned if I do, damned if I don’t.
(Hey, isn’t John supposed to be the “Love” Gospel? How come Pilate doesn’t get some? He’s not even allowed to be the proper villain, but just a lackey fall-guy, a patsy for the High Priest. Say, isn’t that Anti-Semitism I see lurking in the shadows there in the praetorium? I’ll bet Chrysostom and Luther spotted him right off. Isn’t that what Al Gore called “inconvenient Truth?”)
-
(ummm…I think the expression I was going for in the sixth paragraph above is “holed up,” as in trapped in a little hidey-hole, like Saddam Hussein at the end. “Holded up” – where that came from, I have no idea. Or maybe I’ve stumbled upon the perfect vehicle for “fake news” – “fake English.”)
-
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
An extremely timely topic. Thanks, Fritz!
yes we need to forgive our leaders yet make sure they do the right thing – which they aren’t.
More posts
-

Lesson 1: The Reading Groups
Read more: Lesson 1: The Reading GroupsMany years ago my daughter and son-in-law asked me to lead a reading group for a few high school students. Before long it became apparent many more were interested in discussing their faith seriously. At…
-

Lesson 2: Speaking For God
Read more: Lesson 2: Speaking For GodAll three of our youth groups are very troubled with those claiming to speak for God when uttering hate messages. Twice during the last year the High School Reading Group wanted to talk about Westboro…
-

Lesson 3: Ben Laden’s Assasination
Read more: Lesson 3: Ben Laden’s AssasinationBob is quite right when he warns that our response to the actions of those we oppose too often plays into their hands. You see this in many of our reactions to 9/11. All three…
