Lesson 10: Two Christianities

About ten weeks ago, I started using a theology of the cross in an attempt to understand the deep divisions in our church and society. I consistently found myself examining two different kinds of Christianity whose characteristics could surprisingly also be applied to the divisions in society.

One group described our relationship, whether with God or other people, as making a deal, the other as engaging in a love affair. Neither group expressed any appreciation for the other perspective, leaving the government paralyzed and the church witness severely damaged.

In the present situation, making a deal has nothing to do with compromising for the common good. Everything is focused on getting what you want. Working for terms that give you an advantage in achieving power or making a profit is regarded as intellectual achievement.

In this kind of Christianity, salvation is defined as fulfilling the terms of an agreement. You belong to a particular church, say a particular prayer, believe a particular doctrine, or perform particular acts. Because getting it right is foremost, you might make deals with the government to make your particular position public law This group adamantly opposes abortion, same sex marriage, and anything they regard as suppressing freedom of religion.

The other kind of Christianity believes in the primacy of love and uses it to critique all thought, belief, and action. Living in loving relationships with God and others supposedly enables believers to come to new understandings demanded by new circumstances. It warns making deals without love might lead to selling your soul. This group accepts legalizing some forms of abortion and same sex marriage. It also fails to see secret plots to close churches.

A theology of the cross certainly has more in common with this latter group. The crucifixion defines divine love with Christ giving himself unconditionally for humanity and the world. Although Jesus expresses feeling abandoned by all, he forgives those who abuse and kill him. Love understood here as compassion is willingness to suffer for another.

At the same time, this theology impels its advocates to continue seeking reconciliation with the other group. During the Reformation. the Church took sides that demonized one another and literally battled it out in a very similar dispute over law and gospel, works righteousness and grace. Then as now, both sides used governments for their advantage.

Right now, it is extremely difficult to know how the two kinds of Christianity can come together. However, because both perspectives appear in some form throughout the Bible, there are plenty of grounds for appreciating, discussing, and somewhat reconciling the two positions.

Next week, I want to examine more deeply love in a theology of the cross.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. So forgiveness pre-requires understanding the mistakes of the past? here hear re this opposing this me-first, America-first, white-first, male-first approach>…

Lesson 1: Luther’s Theology of the Cross

The pandemic has brought clarity to the current situation in Christianity. As it rages on, it has become apparent there are two incompatible camps not necessarily identified with denominational boundaries. One of these consistently speaks of fighting a battle against evil and clearly regards the other camp as the opposition. The anger and threats being […]

Read More

Lesson 11: Love in a Theology of the Cross (Compassion)

Lupe has prompted me to make clear that I do not mean to advocate 16th century concepts. When I refer to Martin Luther’s theology of the cross helping me understand the problems of the contemporary church, I don’t mean much more than the need to consider the implications of Jesus’ crucifixion when talking about Christian […]

Read More

Lesson 15: Summary of Theology of the Cross

Let’s be honest. I started this series after trying to understand how so many people could support leaders who profess and practice values I regard as unChristian. I had noticed that a theology of the cross, a central part of my Lutheran background, was conspicuously absent in everything I was reading. Now after investigating this […]

Read More

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close