Lesson 12: The Paul Story

I imagine most of us know that the church used Paul’s letters to develop a theology around Jesus’ life and teachings. Although those letters address specific concerns in particular churches, they do assume a rather coherent perspective.

Most of the people in my parish appreciated Paul. However, some berated him over two matters.

The first was that he imposed an orthodoxy on the church that silenced other interpretations. Admittedly, the Church has used him that way at times. However, we can thank God it was he and not most of the others. His theology actually encourages different viewpoints.

It ultimately rests on grace. God’s love frees us from legalism, which demands conformity. It builds the unity of the church on believers cooperating by sharing their different spiritual gifts.

The beginning of 1 Corinthians 13 epitomizes that thought when it maintains that none of the marvelous gifts are truly Christian unless they’re based on love. Love is the only commonality. In fact, Paul encourages some mature believers to follow practices they know are not essential in order to help those who still think they are necessary.

Every part is essential to functioning according to God’s will. It is important to recognize that diversity is part of our identity in a time when some are insisting they have the one and only way to serve Christ.

That brings up the second issue some find troublesome. They believe Paul is a misogynist whose writing has denied the dignity of women to this day. Undoubtedly, some passages in the letters are truly upsetting and have constantly been used to insist a healthy social order depends on male superiority, often white male superiority.

Some scholars find reasons to believe these are not Paul’s words at all. They think they are redactions some inserted to push back against Jesus’ and Paul’s liberating treatment of women. In Galatians, Paul proclaimed “In Christ there is neither male nor female.” In other parts of his letters, he reports women running house churches and even entitles one an apostle.

Of course, these passages remain in the Bible, so we might have to simply recognize that we have been led by the Spirit to realize they are wrong.

However we do it, we certainly have to oppose Christian Nationalists and others who use those texts to support white male superiority. We live in a time when many leaders are fighting equity policies encouraging diversity by claiming they are prejudiced against white males.

Paul’s story begins, of course, with him rounding up and prosecuting those who differed from the pure orthodox Jewish message. Once confronted by Jesus, Paul opened himself to the diversity of other perspectives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. So forgiveness pre-requires understanding the mistakes of the past? here hear re this opposing this me-first, America-first, white-first, male-first approach>…

Lesson 1: Creation 1 — Who We Are

This new series will be based on fundamental Bible stories. In a time of severely divided Christianity, turning to the Bible helps us remember who we are, what we believe, and what we are to do. That’s especially important when so many active Christians no longer know the scriptures. Let’s start with the creation stories […]

Read More

Lesson 13: The Phillip Story

I pulled up this 12-year-old devotion to help write about Phillip. Thinking I could not do any better, I just decided to use it. Besides that, because it predates the Trump reign, it reminds us that our problem has to do with more than one human. Acts 8: 26 The eunuch asked Philip, ‘About whom, […]

Read More

Lesson 23: Summary of Biblical Stories

I wrote this series explicitly to examine biblical stories from the perspective of the American political situation. I wanted to test my perception that the Trump administration creates big problems for those who accept Christian teachings. Lutherans are reluctant to speak against the political order because our founder taught a doctrine of two kingdoms. Supposedly, […]

Read More

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close