So forgiveness pre-requires understanding the mistakes of the past? here hear re this opposing this me-first, America-first, white-first, male-first approach>…
Lesson 1: Questions About Nature
•
•
comments

Comments
2 responses to “Lesson 1: Questions About Nature”
-
Let me preface my comments by stating that I have a lifetime of respect for the scientific method and using science to answer questions. However, I think society has expectations backwards. Instead of asking science to solve matters of faith, we should allow faith to solve matters of science for which we have no answer (yet). Origins of the universe, explained by the big bang theory (remember this is theory) fail to explain where the matter originates that made up the ‘Big Bang’.
I think we (society) try to oversimplify science and make it fit a certain worldview. An example would be climate change. Do we humans affect the climate conditions on the earth by means of modern living? I think anyone would agree everything we do has consequences. The problem for me is the simplistic notion that this results in permanent and catastrophic change to our climate. There is no actual evidence of this, it is all based on calculations and assumptions. Further, I find the idea arrogant – that we even could manage this when you understand the actual science of it. No one goes that far, they root for a political position with no actual critical thought process. The earth is astoundingly resilient. This is no excuse for those who choose to take poor care of what God has given us, but I believe we should beware the arrogance of man in thinking we can destroy the garden that God has provided us.
I find it interesting that the more we search (and with better tools) for another place like earth, we still have not found one. This is statistically improbable. Sometimes the correct answer is the simplest, maybe we really are alone in God’s universe. I choose faith as the most reasonable answer despite many years in pursuit of a scientific (mind of man) answer to many questions.
-
That last note on statistics brought to mind as statistic I’d heard some time back. It was a Reuters poll that found 22% of Americans expect the world to end within their lifetimes. It’s pretty easy to see how that outlook on life makes hundred year projections of our impacts fairly meaningless.
I suppose I can also see how it might be hard to argue for environmentalism with “Bible literalists.” If God can create species with little more than a word why would they care about extinctions? If they can create the whole of the world in less than a day, why would God care about strip mining any more than I’d care about one of my children scooping up some sand in a sandbox?
Environmentalism makes more sense from a “theistic evolution” sense, where Genesis is metaphor and it really took God billions of years to create life and the world we know.
While our current understanding points to a situation more like the latter, I suppose at some level I’ve always had a bit of discomfort with the “smaller” feeling God there.
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
An extremely timely topic. Thanks, Fritz!
yes we need to forgive our leaders yet make sure they do the right thing – which they aren’t.
More posts
-

Lesson 1: The Reading Groups
Read more: Lesson 1: The Reading GroupsMany years ago my daughter and son-in-law asked me to lead a reading group for a few high school students. Before long it became apparent many more were interested in discussing their faith seriously. At…
-

Lesson 2: Speaking For God
Read more: Lesson 2: Speaking For GodAll three of our youth groups are very troubled with those claiming to speak for God when uttering hate messages. Twice during the last year the High School Reading Group wanted to talk about Westboro…
-

Lesson 3: Ben Laden’s Assasination
Read more: Lesson 3: Ben Laden’s AssasinationBob is quite right when he warns that our response to the actions of those we oppose too often plays into their hands. You see this in many of our reactions to 9/11. All three…
