All posts tagged word of God

Lesson 48: Electronic Conversations

Let me first summarize the responses to how the church can foster conversation and then make a few observations about religious use of electronic communication. Conversations with Myron lead me to speak a few words about Islam next week. Then we’ll begin a new course on “Salvation” in October.

Anne welcomed a chance to discuss sermons after the service. I see it operating like the success I’ve had in comparing interpretations of biblical passages. The sermon and the passage serve as springboards for relating the faith to our everyday life. Many of my students say this is what they want- to hear what others think rather than an authorized position. Obviously, some of that comes with using electronic media rather than books.

Bob suggests this would entail developing methods that facilitate people’s sharing. Rita taught me long ago story-telling could be one of these. Stories are infectious, enabling others to tell theirs. Recently I ran across a testimonial-centered practice that used the old religious testimony in a creative manner. These seem natural for the Judaic-Christian traditions that are essentially narrative.

However, I am inclined to think success might have more to do with the moderator’s attitude and the group’s expectations than method. Anne agrees that ground rules encouraging the participation of all by promising “no put-downs” would go a long way.
They encourage comparisons rather than consensus. Perhaps it is time to admit our faith enables us to think and act in uncertain times, trusting God’s guidance and correction. Our religion is always embedded in history with all its messiness. Although Bob’s most recent comment about attempting purely religious understandings is fascinating, I wonder if it too is seeking an unattainable certainty. It might be fun to pursue, but the results might be irrelevant. Christian faith is always embedded in history, so perhaps it is necessary to speak of political positions and particularities.

Take a look at the “gift of reception” in the article Rita sent me from the National Catholic Reporter for some interesting insights in our topic.

Let me end with a few things about electronic communication. Wherever I go, I hear people express Lupe’s concern that the Church learn to use these wisely. My son, Franz, and I have studied religious use of the Internet for decades. Contrary to popular belief, it is very prevalent and appropriate. In 2003 almost a third of all the people who went online used the Internet for a religious purpose. That is more than those who used it to gamble, trade stocks, bank, date, or participate in an auction. Sixty per cent of those used it to research their own faith traditions. I imagine those figures have remained pretty much the same after 7 years.

Our studies encouraged church use of the Internet to facilitate, enhance, and extend her community, but never to replace it. This is especially important when sociologists report we have far more acquaintances and far less friends in this electronic age. The Internet is “narrow-band”, great for transmitting knowledge but very limited in teaching wisdom. My high school group contains experts in sharing information over the Internet. They are hungry, however, to work honestly with others in evaluating the worth of this information. That is hard to do that on the Internet. The binary nature of the tool influences how it is used. It communicates well what the writer is doing, thinking, and feeling, but has great difficulty maintaining a creative dialogue. It is very limited in communicating the nuances, complexity, and messiness of real life. Franz and I often observe that Christian community, like the Sacrament, demands the real presence of people as well as the real presence of Christ.

Relative to this, Anne reported that one of my sons-in-law recently asked the congregation to email their responses to a sermon on prayer life. Hopefully, he will share electronically the responses and encourage further conversation. My experience is my readers prefer to communicate through me rather than with each other. But I am still looking for the interaction Sarah gets with her online courses at Leslie.

Lesson 47: Conversation in the Community

I hope you remembered we are trying to make a list of ways the church might foster creative conversation, I can not report on our progress until next week as I am on vacation. However, let me offer some of my experiences.

The first that pops to mind are the High School and Young Adult Reading Groups that meet in my home. They report they come for the fine dining my wife offers and the kind of conversation they don’t find else where. When they describe what they mean, they speak of hearing what others think about a controversial subject. Here’s what happens: I send out a one or two page paper on a topic they have chosen. At the beginning of the year I set the one ground rule, “No put downs. Everyone has something that needs to be heard” I make a very brief opening statement that often is a question. I then bite my tongue and let them talk. I contribute when technical information would help. At the end of the meeting they chose the subject they would like to discuss next time.

The second are the house churches Bob mentioned. These are essentially small groups that meet regularly. Some participants use them for their primary church experience, but others regard them as supplements to traditional worship. One of the best I know was the Sycramore Community that gathered in State College, Pennsylvania. Their conversation encouraged a prophetic ministry. People often noted they knew them through their public demonstrations for a good cause. They also were pioneers in the sexual revolution. After deciding the church had to speak more clearly, they commissioned Rustum and Della Roy to write Honest Sex in the 1970s.

I struggle to find ways to make sermons more dynamic. My partner and I achieved a bit when we wrote and presented dramatic two-person plays in place of traditional sermons. It was interesting that this form enabled us to tackle more controversial issues. I also found gathering lay people to help write a sermon significant. After discussing the text, their ideas could easily be incorporated in the proclamation. Although I never tried it, I always thought inviting those interested in discussing the sermon after the service might be beneficial. I also felt we should be able to present discussions or even debates between lay people in the sermon slot.

I think all pastors should be offering and participating in small group classes. Their mode of operation should be listening as well as teaching. One of the most frequent comments I hear after many pastors teach is “I would have liked to ask him some questions, but he had too much to say”. Without critiquing what that means, I can still suggest a pastor should never speak without keeping at least half of the time for discussion from the class.

Of course, this online study has tried to be a conversation with some limited success. Most of group only reads the posts, a few make online comments; and more have chosen to email me personally. I am sure some of that comes from my inability to remove myself enough to enable conversation between participants.

So let’s see if we can get some more suggestions of ways the Church can foster conversation among lay people.